Extending protection for workers suffering mental disorders

Today during question period I rose to as the Minister of Labour when he was going to deliver on his commitment to more broadly extend the presumptive clause for work-related mental health disorders to other workers.

This was the first question that the minister has been asked since he was sworn in so he had a fair amount of “pent up answer” waiting for a question.

Below I reproduce the video and text of the exchange.


Video of Exchange



Question


A. Weaver: Mental disorders incurred from job-related trauma are serious injuries that can be debilitating. This government recently introduced protections by adding a presumptive clause for this kind of workplace injury. Now certain first responders are supported for injuries that can arise from the important work that they do.

While I am pleased that B.C. is extending protection for some workers, I’m concerned that others who suffer mental disorders on the job are being left out. Particularly, I’m profoundly troubled that professions such as nursing, teaching and social work — professions that employ disproportionate numbers of women compared to men — are being left out.

When I raised this issue earlier this year, the minister stated that he shared my concern and was committed to every worker getting the help and safety protection they need. What has the minister done to deliver on this commitment?


Answer


Hon. H. Bains: On the last day of the session, the last one to get a question, and I just want to tell you how thrilled I am to get that question. I want to thank the member for asking this question and giving me the opportunity to talk about the health and safety of workers in this province.

I share your passion about health and safety of workers in this province, Member. That’s why my goal is to make workplaces in British Columbia the safest in the country. You do that by having a strong preventative and training program so that we prevent injuries from happening in the first place. Then those who are injured or sick at workplace — that we treat them with respect and dignity and give them care and support when they need it so that they are able to go back to their pre-injury work as soon as they can.

That’s why we brought in Bill 9: to give protections to those workers who are first on the scene at a very dangerous and challenging situation. The first responders have been asking for these changes for a long time, and their requests have been ignored time and again. Well, we’re going to change that. I am considering expanding presumption to other groups of people, and as a result, I have been meeting with those groups — like nurses, CUPE, the dispatchers who are represented by CUPE — and other workers and with the member that asked this question so that we can continue to work to enhance and provide better working conditions for the working people of this province.

I believe and I know that everyone in this House believes that every worker deserves to go home healthy and safe at the end of their shift or their work. Anything less is unacceptable, and I do


Supplementary Question


A. Weaver: I’m beginning to regret asking these questions these last few days. Yet more pent-up answer looking for a question to deliver to.

I do have a supplemental. The supplemental is this. The Canadian Institute for Public Safety Research and Treatment at University of Regina undertook research that found that the percentage of 911 operators and dispatchers who suffer from post-traumatic disorder as a result of their work is comparable to those for police officers. But in B.C., affected 911 operators and dispatchers continue to fight for treatment and compensation while struggling with work-related mental health disorders.

We now have the tools to ensure they get the coverage they need. To the Minister of Labour: briefly, what concrete steps has the minister taken to expand the support we now offer to other first responders? And what steps are those now being applied to 911 dispatchers and call receivers?


Answer


Hon. H. Bains: Mr. Speaker, you can never be brief when you’re talking about the health or safety of working people in this province. The member knows that I’ve been discussing with him and other members of this House and all those workers who need better protection when they go to work. And they need protection when they are injured or sick at workplaces.

First responders have been asking for these changes for a long time. In fact, my colleague, the member now of Social Development and Poverty Reduction has put a private member’s bill in this House asking for just those changes that was ignored by the previous government.

UBCM 2016 passed a similar resolution and was ignored by this government. It doesn’t surprise me, member, because, if you’ve watched you watch for the last 16 years, the only time the members of that government stood up in this House to talk about workers was when they were ripping up their collective agreements, when they were eliminating the injured workers’ benefits, or when they were cutting their health and safety protection.

We said that we will do things differently. Workers know now that they have a government that respects them, a government that values their work. You know, we have taken some steps, and more is coming, Member — and everyone here — and workers know that

3 Comments

  1. Ron Good-
    June 9, 2018 at 10:10 pm

    How about reforming Bill 20 which says if we are injured in a car accident, our PTSD and mental illnesses are classified as minor injuries? Oh I see that Andrew Weaver and Harry’s Bains voted for that. Typical old style politicians.

    • June 10, 2018 at 10:18 am

      Hello Ron, that is not what the act says.

      serious impairment“, in relation to a claimant, means a physical or mental impairment that
      (a) is not resolved within 12 months, or another prescribed period, if any, after the date of an accident, and
      (b) meets prescribed criteria.

      (2) Subject to subsection (3) and the regulations, an injury that, at the time of the accident or when it first manifested, was an injury within the definition of “minor injury” in subsection (1) is deemed to be a minor injury if
      (a) the claimant, without reasonable excuse, fails to seek a diagnosis or comply with treatment in accordance with a diagnostic and treatment protocol prescribed for the injury, and
      (b) the injury
      (i) results in a serious impairment or a permanent serious disfigurement of the claimant, or
      (ii) develops into an injury other than an injury within the definition of “minor injury” in subsection (1).

      PTSD or another serious mental illness arising from a car accident would almost certainly be classified as a serious injury as it would not be resolved in 12 months.

  2. Shirley Patterson-
    June 2, 2018 at 11:10 am

    This is a highly charged issue. I worked for a large non profit agency providing career counseling to some of the most disenfranchised populations in Vancouver as well as new immigrants struggling with cultural, economic and employment challenges. I loved my work but I couldn’t cope with the burnout from trying to help those overwhelmed with the challenges that face them. I landed up in hospital for 1 month. My family fell apart and I struggled to recover. I was off work for 6 months and the day I went back to work, I was fired. No reason was given. I can’t rewrite the past but we must provide sanctuary for those suffering from mental disorders. I have had a long history of working with groups of people considered to be “high risk”. Thank you for trying to change this situation as it has happened to many many workers.