Today in the legislature I rose during Question Period to ask the Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations two distinct questions. In the first, I asked how he reconciles his Ministry’s efforts to preserved at-risk caribou herds while at the same time issuing more hunting permits for the same caribou.  In the second question I ask him what he plans to do to preserve the last remaining old growth valley-bottoms on Vancouver Island.

Below I reproduce the text and video of our exchange.


Video of Exchange



Question


A. Weaver: I’ve just been walking around with a smile on my face today from ear to ear, and I continue to ask that question in that spirit.

There are 54 caribou herds in British Columbia, 30 of which are at risk of extirpation. Fourteen have less than 25 animals, and the B.C. Government website lists that one of these herds has precisely one individual, whereas another has three. Since the information was posted on the site, it’s likely that they’re gone as well.

British Columbia’s caribou herds are in crisis, and scientists have been raising the alarm for many, many years. After nearly managing the species into oblivion, we’re now desperately trying to save them by any means possible. Yet, at the same time as we try to avoid extirpation in one area, in a neighbouring area, the government issues and permits a legal caribou hunt.

To the Minister of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations: aside from the First Nations’ food, social and ceremonial hunt, how many caribou is he permitting to be hunted in British Columbia in the 2019-2020 limited area hunt and general open season in management units 617 to 620 and 622 to 627?


Answer


Hon. D. Donaldson: Thank you to the Leader of the Third Party for the question to talk about an important animal, an iconic species in B.C. and across Canada and internationally. That is the caribou.

I think it’s been pointed out already in question period so far that unlike the old government, we take the decline in caribou populations very seriously. Going back to 2003, the previous government ignored calls for action to protect caribou habitat for over a decade and kept in place a patchwork of measures that don’t meet federal standards, putting jobs at risk and caribou at risk.

As far as the hunting of caribou that the member asked about, we know that the Chase, Wolverine and Itch-Ilgachuz herds are classified as threatened, and the herd populations continue to decline. That’s why we closed the caribou hunt for these three herds this past March, and this hunt will remain closed until further notice. There are some herds that are still available for hunting, and those are the Carcross and Atlin herds in my constituency, in the northwest corner of B.C. Both herds have in excess of 800 animals.

The member is right. When it’s based on the best available science, and when conservation is the top priority, followed by First Nations’ food spiritual and ceremonial needs, only then is hunting allowed. There are very few animals available for hunt — approximately ten.


Supplementary Question


A. Weaver: Well, that’s inconsistent with the information I have here, where it looks like 268 permits have been issued for caribou in Skeena region 6, which would be ironic in light of the fact the minister just mentioned 800-some animals in and around that area.

The point I’m making here is we’re hunting caribou while we try to save caribou. There’s no overall strategy. Caribou, as we know, are dependent on old-growth boreal and mountain economic systems. For many herds, their main food source is lichen that grows on old trees, and cutblocks and logging roads make them much more vulnerable to predators, as we all know.

Yesterday the United Nations released a landmark study reporting that over a million species are now at risk of extinction, and habitat loss is the driving factor. In B.C., we only act when it’s already too late. For example, our invaluable Vancouver Island valley-bottom old growth is globally rare and is an essential habitat for many species.

My question is again to the Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations. Will this government stop its Loraxian approach to resource management and step in to protect the last intact, productive valley-bottom old growth on Vancouver Island?


Answer


Well, I understand we were talking about caribou. There are no caribou on Vancouver Island. I’m sure the member knows that. As far as old-growth forests go on Vancouver Island, we’re committed to creating an old-growth plan in consultation with industry, in consultation with environmental NGOs and in consultation with communities.

We know that old-growth forests provide incredibly important habitat for biodiversity. There are over 500,000 hectares of old growth already protected on Vancouver Island through protected areas and parks. We also know that old-growth forests provide important revenue for communities and important jobs for forestry workers. We’ll continue to manage old growth in a sustainable way, and we’ll continue to work on the caribou file to protect jobs and to protect caribou.

5 Comments

  1. Dale Townsendf-
    May 13, 2019 at 9:20 pm

    “We’ll continue to manage old growth in a sustainable way,..” It is difficult to believe that any presumably intelligent person could utter such nonsense in the context given. Once an old growth tree is cut, it is gone. There is nothing to regard as “sustainable”. What arrant, foolish and arrogant stupidity.

  2. Celeste Varley-
    May 12, 2019 at 3:23 pm

    Good work, Dr Weaver.
    Have you seen/read this inspiring piece? (I sent it to John Horgan.)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lLTUC9F_14
    CelloBride – Voicing the Forest – Solo Cello – (Big Lonely Doug tree) 4K
    Please keep up the good work!

  3. John Campbell-
    May 12, 2019 at 3:04 pm

    I am pleased to see the Green Party raising ecological concerns in addition to global warming.

    The minister’s claim that there remains 500,000 hectares of old growth forest on Vancouver Island is a deceptive claim often made by members of the NDP government.

    Vancouver Island totals about 3,000,000 hectares and this claim is that 1/6 is old growth forest. This claim, given any reasonable definition of old growth forests, is easily seen to be incorrect by anyone who has travelled on the island with their eyes open. I suspect it includes all areas of Vancouver Island that have not been logged or otherwise cleared, including the rocks and ice alpine areas.

    The most ecologically important old growth to preserve is the productive valley bottoms.

  4. John Campbell-
    May 12, 2019 at 2:48 pm

    Good to see the Green Party raising ecological concerns in addition to global warming.

    The claim by the minister that there remains over 500,000 hectares of old growth forest on Vancouver Island is similar to claims made by other NDP MLAs. I suspect they have been briefed to make this deceptive claim.

    Vancouver Island in total is about 30,000 sq. km or 3,000,000 hectares. This claim is that about 1/6 of the total area is old growth. I suspect that they are including all the rock and ice area of alpine regions in their category of ‘old growth forest’.

    Ecologically, the most important areas of old growth are the productive valley bottoms of which almost none remains.

    Please continue to push them on this important issue.

  5. Michael Kennedy-
    May 7, 2019 at 3:13 pm

    The last time I looked the forest industry’s position was that it would take 90 years to make the full transition to 2nd growth wood. When you hold this up against the daily rate of destruction of old-growth forest by area it’s a ‘no hope’ scenario! It might be useful to create a graphic presentation that shows day by day elimination of O/G forest lands.
    Carry on Andrew-you’re my one ray of bright light these days.
    MK